Monday, November 19, 2012

Piltdown


                  The Piltdown hoax happened in the early 1900s and had fooled many scientists for over 40 years. In 1912 in Luis, by the village of Piltdown Charles Dawson had been digging in a gravel pit. He had claimed to have found a piece of a human skull. Dawson had asked three other scientists to join him with his future searches in finding more fossils. Soon after a jaw bone was found although it was nothing of what anyone had ever seen before. The jaw line had an ape structure yet the teeth were example of human teeth because they were flat. This was an extreme find at that time because no fossils had ever been found in Europe before. The hoax was discovered by a full scale analysis that was launched in 1953. They discovered that there were scratches on the teeth giving them evidence that the teeth had actually been filed down. The jawbone was less than 100 years old and it was from a female orangutan giving them evidence that someone had actually forged the fossils. The forgery of these fossils cause scientists to believe that there were earlier findings that they had not yet found before.

                In this situation any scientist can get ahead of themselves in trying to be the best. Yes they are only human but when it comes to being the best, most humans try there hardest no matter what. Just in this situation, of whoever faked the fossil, tried to prove something to be the best and he turned out to be fraud. Faults like this effect the scientific process in multiple ways starting from the results. If people keep attempting to fake all of these fossils imagine the devastation in multiple situations.

                A scientist named Kenneth Oakley had ran a test called a fluorine test. The fluorine would accumulate calcium that would contain organic matter like bones and teeth. But what Oakley had discovered from this test was that the fossils had to of been less than 50,000 years old. From what they had claimed that this was from an ape like specie, that is definitely not true because it was not even old enough to be qualified as an ape like species. Two more scientists names Joseph Weiner and Wilfred Le Gros Clark had teamed up to further along the investigation to prove that the fossils were not what they had been said to be. The two fossils had been proved that they were actually 2 separate species not even of the same kind. The part of a skull was from a human and then the jaw was from an ape. The scratched proved the teeth were filed down in order to make them look like a humans. Other findings that Dawson had claimed to have been found were also proven to be artificially stained in which made to match the local gravels.

                In certain situations I believe it is possible to remove the human factor just to make it so certain situations like these do not happen. Although most of the time humans are how we find out certiana aspects of life. So that would be one hard thing to change. Never take anything or judge a book by a cover. Mainly because you can’t always prove everything just by looking at the cover. That is one thing that I learned from this scandal.

3 comments:

  1. Some knowledge I gained from your post was how extreme this find was because fossils had never been found in Europe before. I also agree that there are situations in life where people then to get ahead of themselves in trying to be the best. This could be caused by several emotions including excitement as well as pride.I actually feel that it is impossible to remove the human factor because, even if we used technology only, humans would be the ones to input the information and miscalculations could still be made. I also feel that these mistakes teach life long lessons and without the human factor we wouldn't progress or feel as motivated. Great information and point of view.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Casey,

    I thought it was really interesting in how you said that all scientists try to be the best. I totally agree with that, but I also think that scientists need to be able to fail, and then be okay with it. That is one way to learn and grow. Good job on your post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pretty good on the synopsis. Actually, fossils had been found in Europe, but not in England. That was part of the problem. England wanted to produce it's own early man, just as Germany and France had done.

    What was the significance of this find? What did it contribute (had it be valid) the our understanding of human evolution?

    Interesting to read your comment about scientists wanting to be the "best". In this case, that wouldn't mean finding a well-supported fossil, correct? :-) I think in this case, "best" was measured by notoriety, which should never be the goal of science.

    Were there any other negative factors that influenced the acceptance of this find as valid?

    Good description of the methods that uncovered the hoax. What aspects of science itself (the process itself, not the methods) led to revealing the evidence for the fraud.

    How would we remove the human factor? Are there any aspects of humans that would be bad to take away from science? Curiosity? Inventiveness? Innovation? Creativity?

    Can you explain your "can't judge a book by it's cover" comment a little more fully?

    ReplyDelete